Documents &
Articles which concern Catholic and Labor IssuesPapal
Social EncyclicalsOther Catholic
Social Teachings Catholic Hospitals
& Labor Catholic Schools
& Labor Msgr. George Higgins Catholic Worker Connection General Articles of Interest Home Page The Catholic-Labor Network is dependent on interested
persons sharing their activities struggles, victories and prayers with
other like minded men and women of faith. We strongly invite all those who visit this page,
and who share a common interest in issues effecting the Catholic
Church and the Labor Movement to subscribe. Occasionally, notices
will be sent when this page is updated. When important events happen,
we will pass on the information through the e-mail list, and most of all,
the e-mail list is a means by which we can pray and support each other.
Some Catholic and Labor Links | Funding Social Services Provided by ChurchesBy Msgr. George G. HigginsThe Yardstick
March 26, 2001
President Bush's program of funding social services provided by faith-based
organizations predictably has stirred up a public debate about the separation
of church and state. Less predictably, serious questions about funding faith-based
programs have been raised by conservative religious groups which fear, not
that these programs will violate the separation of church and state but that
they will limit the freedom of religious organizations to follow their own
beliefs in the administration of social programs.
Both of these issues are, of course, very important, but my own interest
in the president's program has less to do with these two issues than with
the real meaning of the principle of subsidiarity to which many proponents
of the president's program have appealed as their primary
argument in favor of funding faith-based social service agencies.
The principle of subsidiarity is so central to Catholic social teaching
that it has come to be thought of in some circles as an exclusively Catholic
principle of social ethics. The principle says, in rough summary, that institutions
closest to individuals should meet social needs to the extent that they can:
families, communities, churches, voluntary organizations, local governments
and state governments as opposed to the federal government. To borrow the
title of an influential book by the late F.E. Schumacher, the principle of
subsidiarity is condensed by some into the simplistic adage that “small is
beautiful.” Maybe so, but a word of caution is in order.
To say that small is beautiful is not to say, without a carload of qualifications,
that government is best which governs least or that so-called big government
-- i.e. the federal government -- is by definition a violation of the principle
of subsidiarity.
The principle of subsidiarity as we understand it today does not mean
that that government is best which governs least. To the contrary, it means
that while government should not arbitrarily usurp the role of individuals
or voluntary organizations in social and economic life, neither should it
hesitate to adopt such programs as are required by the common good and are
beyond the competence of individual citizens or groups of citizens.
Certain Catholic writers may themselves be partially to blame that some
non-Catholics fail to see that this is the real meaning of the principle
of subsidiarity in the Catholic tradition of social ethics. Such Catholic
writers, in order to highlight the importance of voluntary nongovernmental
organizations, may have left the impression inadvertently that they were
playing down the proper role of government in the field of social welfare
and social reform.
If any Catholic writers in the past took such a one-sided view of the
principle of subsidiarity, their definition of the principle was corrected
by Pope John XXIII's encyclicals “Mater et Magistra” (“Christianity and Social
Progress”) and “Pacem in Terris” (“Peace on Earth”). One of the most noteworthy
features of these two encyclicals is their realistic and sophisticated emphasis
on the need for government -- even so-called big government -- to play a
crucial role in social life because of the complexity of the problems that
have arisen since the publication in 1891 of Leo XIII's encyclical “Rerum
Novarum” and the publication in 1931 of Pius XI's encyclical “Quadragesimo
Anno.”
Pope John XXIII's two encyclicals stressed the fact that, in light of
the complexity of modern social and economic life, there must be the closest
possible cooperation between voluntary groups and the government, and that
the government, in addition to helping voluntary groups whenever feasible,
is also required to do much on its own initiative in the field of social
welfare and social reform.
Papal
Social Encyclicals
Other
Catholic Social Teachings
General
Articles of Interest
Catholic
Worker Connection Msgr. George
Higgins
Home
Page E-Mail: Fr. Sinclair Oubre
|